Posted November 28, 2016 (edited) Before FMM2016v.7.2, IF role in EME is not much different with W. No cut inside, No shoot. (There still has some rules to make IF move to center.) In FMM2016v.7.2 update, the thing is changed. IF role are totally changed. Now IF will 1. Move to FC position when team with ball. 2. Back to side when team without ball. But I am still not happy for current setting of IF. 1. Currently movement of IF is not "cut inside", they are just moving to box directly. IMO, cut inside means player dribbling with ball from sideline to box, they will choose shoot, pass, or cross in different situations. 2. Many gamers to set two IF with at least one FC, even have a AP in AMC and BBM in MC. Yes. this kind tactics works well in game, but it is too crowded in box. I don't like it. What is your opinion for IF role? Edited November 28, 2016 by rseven 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 28, 2016 I'm not too sure if the IF role in FMM at the moment is exactly the same as real life, but my IF does well in game, scoring and assisting at a healthy rate, so I'm satisfied. 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 28, 2016 3 hours ago, rseven said: Before FMM2016v.7.2, IF role in EME is not much different with W. No cut inside, No shoot. (There still has some rules to make IF move to center.) In FMM2016v.7.2 update, the thing is changed. IF role are totally changed. Now IF will 1. Move to FC position when team with ball. 2. Back to side when team without ball. But I am still not happy for current setting of IF. 1. Currently movement of IF is not "cut inside", they are just moving to box directly. IMO, cut inside means player dribbling with ball from sideline to box, they will choose shoot, pass, or cross in different situations. 2. Many gamers to set two IF with at least one FC, even have a AP in AMC and BBM in MC. Yes. this kind tactics works well in game, but it is too crowded in box. I don't like it. What is your opinion for IF role? I totally agree 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 28, 2016 Inside forward role has needed fixing since the EME was added to the game but as long as the role scores goals people won't care. 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 28, 2016 1 hour ago, Scott said: Inside forward role has needed fixing since the EME was added to the game but as long as the role scores goals people won't care. Even before that as never really worked on OME. Tbh I still don't think they work on OME. 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 28, 2016 They need to balance the wingers and inf's more. Inf's to OP if you ask me and wingers underwelmd 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 29, 2016 Yeah we think they are a little over-effective at present too, movement in the box a little too good. 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 29, 2016 5 hours ago, Alari said: Yeah we think they are a little over-effective at present too, movement in the box a little too good. Great that you are looking in to it! Meanwhile check the effectiveness of strikers this could be a bit beter 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Posted November 29, 2016 All wide roles need improving, poachers should be made less effective and the rest of the forward roles need improving. 0 Quote Report Share Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.