Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Help Advice On My 4-4-2 Attacking Tatics


Recommended Posts

Heres my formation and instructions

Screenshot_2017-01-17-13-04-57.pngScreenshot_2017-01-17-13-05-11.pngand here are 

Heres my fixture history

Screenshot_2017-01-17-13-05-52.pngScreenshot_2017-01-17-13-07-18.pngScreenshot_2017-01-17-13-07-41.png

As you can see, I've had a few bad results and my tatics are feeling a bit stale. Any suggestions? 

 

Screenshot_2017-01-17-13-06-28.png

Screenshot_2017-01-17-13-07-26.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say you're playing a TM but no wingers so he isn't getting the crosses. You have a CM and APM which are two passing roles then a BPD. Play Ki as a BWM. Also drop the BPD, your team isn't the best and you have 2 players going forward from defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dec said:

I would say you're playing a TM but no wingers so he isn't getting the crosses. You have a CM and APM which are two passing roles then a BPD. Play Ki as a BWM. Also drop the BPD, your team isn't the best and you have 2 players going forward from defence.

So maybe two wingers and fullbacks instead of wing backs? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, CmonJustTheTip said:

So maybe two wingers and fullbacks instead of wing backs? 

Yes that would work. Assuming dropping Ki to a BWM is a good option?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The results are way better than you could expect with a team lacking quality :) 

defence is 3 men running forward and a goalie that goes claudia bravo-mode - you need to Secure the defence yes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dec said:

I would say you're playing a TM but no wingers so he isn't getting the crosses. You have a CM and APM which are two passing roles then a BPD. Play Ki as a BWM. Also drop the BPD, your team isn't the best and you have 2 players going forward from defence.

Wouldn't the WB's get sufficiently forward to provide the crosses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, veerus said:

Wouldn't the WB's get sufficiently forward to provide the crosses?

I find wing backs with 2 INFs don't provide the relevant width to do well. Though you can argue 4 players in and around the box is excessive with a 5th pushing forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dec said:

I find wing backs with 2 INFs don't provide the relevant width to do well. Though you can argue 4 players in and around the box is excessive with a 5th pushing forward.

They should do the job with the attacking mentality 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...